Since the global recession ended, it is clear in most countries that the rich have become richer and the poor have become poorer. People are shocked and angry and the typical battle of them versus us has flared up again and all the fairness and unfairness that goes with it.
What I find shocking, is that people are shocked that the rich are richer and the poor are poorer, it can be no other way. I wont give you all that law of attraction stuff, or like attracts like stuff or even what ever you focus on expands, which a lot of people refer to as new age mumbo jumbo even if it's true.
I will give you this instead, generally speaking poorer people or those who have found themselves poorer from the recession hold on to things and what has happened, instead of moving on. Rich people took their losses and moved on, generally speaking and for the most part didn't allow fear to cloud their judgment about moving forward into new or different investments or opportunities.
Of course it's not as simple and straightforward as that, there are many factors, it just so happens that I see and hear of this holding on rather than letting go a lot, there are many, systemic and other factors that contribute as well.
My focus instead is directed towards the, them versus us battles that ensue and how that is actually limiting poor people from making more and believe it or not how it actually holds back the rich from become richer. I know, the last thing you wanted the read, the rich getting even richer again! why not, there is no shortage of money or finance or wealth which many people think.
Consider this, we have more millionaires now than ever before, even in countries that had few or none before. Don't forget how poor China was considered before and now generally speaking is wealthy and yes they have a huge trade surplus, yet no country or countries are poorer by the amount that China has gained in wealth. So the poor can become richer and so can the rich, it's a win win.
However the them versus us, battles are holding this back from happening. Some wealthy people believe that some of the poor are lazy, don't want to work are free loaders and should just work harder. There is no doubt that is true in some cases but the percentage that applies to is small. Likewise some of the poor think that the rich are crooked and buy their way to success, that they don't pay their fair share in taxes, that they look for the loop holes and just get lucky, that there is a system for the rich and one for the poor and it's unfair. Again there is no doubt that some of that is true but the percentage that it applies to is small as well.
Yet in both cases when it does happen, it hits the news cycle in a big and disproportionate way and both sides are lulled into a false belief that the majority of each side behaves this way when it is simply not true. Politicians and other groups grab hold of this and exploit to serve their own cause a lot of the time, further fuelling the great divide and both sides become frustrated with each other, holding everyone back.
In most them versus us disputes, each side believes it's the other side who needs to, or must change, same is true whether its at home or work or in the national debate. How does that work out? Usually not well and when change does happen it's often an extreme change that in the long term is not beneficial. The truth is both sides are required to make changes as both sides in their imbalanced view point are overlooking their own weak points or areas that can or should be changed.
In the current rich versus poor battle, neither side wants to make real changes, no one wants to give up benefits they are receiving either through welfare programs or through the 70,000 page tax code. It's absurd to hear oil executives fighting to retain $2billion a year in tax breaks, when they will earn profits of $100 billon this year and it's absurd for union leaders who don't see the need to change a system that has $200k life guards and gold plated retirement packages.
Even if we were to confisicate all the wealth from to rich and divide it amongst all those with much less, it would not move that many poor people out of poverty or lasting wealth. Most charity efforts are geared towards survival, which is necessary of course, what if more were directed towards better training opportunities and skills, investing opportunities and skills to move more people into that rich category. There is very little attention given to that, instead it's the traditional poor versus rich and all the argument and politics that come with it.
It would be better to just focus on either getting richer or seeking ways to move from poorer to becoming rich, it is possible. Human nature though will often get you involved or at least being unable to escape what's going on and if that's the case, then you will be better focused on changes from both sides to not only feel better, but to actually stand a chance for progress.
This I feel is true no matter what the situation. As always look for examples closer to home, parents versus the kids, parent versus parent etc did you overlook what you could change and instead put all the change requirements on the other side? How long have you been holding on to that?